Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-PA) has just thrown a curveball at the FBI by refusing to sit for a voluntary interview over a controversial social media video.
Breitbart reported that six Democratic lawmakers, including Deluzio, posted a video urging military members to disregard illegal orders, sparking accusations of treason from the president and prompting an FBI investigation.
This saga began when the group of lawmakers decided to play digital crusaders, uploading a video that’s now landed them in hot water with the highest office in the land.
The president didn’t mince words, suggesting the six Democrats crossed a line into treasonous territory with their message to the military. Shortly after, the FBI stepped in, launching an investigation to dig deeper into the intent behind the lawmakers’ online plea.
As of the day before Deluzio’s latest public statement, reports surfaced that the FBI sought voluntary interviews with him and his fellow video stars.
On Wednesday, Deluzio took to CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” to air his side of the story, facing questions from host John Berman.
“What’s been reported out there is they’ve tried to contact me and the other members for voluntary interviews,” Deluzio said, confirming the FBI’s outreach.
But here’s the kicker—Deluzio isn’t rolling out the welcome mat for federal agents, politely but firmly shutting the door on their request with a stance that’s sure to raise eyebrows.
“I’m not planning a sit down for a voluntary interview, no,” Deluzio declared to Berman, doubling down on his position.
While he’s within his rights to decline, one has to wonder if this move will paint him as a defender of free speech or simply defiant in the face of accountability.
After all, when the FBI comes knocking over a video that’s got the president crying treason, a chat might clear the air—or at least show a willingness to engage.
Deluzio’s refusal isn’t illegal, but it does send a signal that could be read as dismissive of serious allegations, especially when national security rhetoric is in play.
From a conservative lens, this looks like another chapter in the progressive playbook—challenging authority while sidestepping the consequences, though it’s fair to note his concern about intimidation as a member of Congress.
Still, if the goal was to stand on principle, Deluzio might find that principle tested by public opinion, especially among those who see the military as sacrosanct and beyond political messaging.
