A 440-year-old map and modern radar scans keep the Noah's Ark mystery alive

 May 27, 2026

A massive Renaissance-era world map, drawn by an Italian nobleman in 1587, contains a small but striking detail that researchers say lines up with a boat-shaped geological formation in eastern Turkey, the same site where ground-penetrating radar recently revealed hidden chambers and tunnel-like corridors beneath the earth.

The map is the Planisphere, a hand-drawn cartographic masterpiece created by Urbano Monte. It stretches nearly 10 feet across when its 60 individual sheets are assembled into a single circular image. Packed with illustrations of continents, mythical creatures, ships, and sea monsters, the map was designed from a north polar perspective, placing the Arctic at the center of the known world. And tucked within its elaborate detail is a depiction of Noah's Ark resting on the mountains of Ararat in modern-day Turkey.

That detail, overlooked for centuries, now draws fresh attention. Independent researcher Jimmy Corsetti flagged the connection in an online post, writing: "The same location as the Durupinar site, virtually the exact same length. Coincidence?"

The Durupınar Formation: a boat-shaped ridge 18 miles from Ararat

The Durupınar Formation sits 18 miles south of Mount Ararat, Turkey's tallest peak. A Kurdish shepherd first spotted it in May 1948 after heavy rains and earthquakes washed away surrounding mud, exposing a boat-shaped ridge that has fascinated researchers and believers ever since.

The formation's dimensions track closely with the biblical account. Genesis 8:4 states the Ark came to rest on the "mountains of Ararat" after the Great Flood. Scripture describes the vessel as 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high, roughly 515 feet long, 86 feet wide, and 52 feet tall. Newsmax reported the Durupınar Formation measures 538 feet in length, a boat-shaped ridge whose proportions mirror the biblical record.

Archaeologist and amateur researcher Ron Wyatt first visited the site in 1977 and claimed the formation was the remains of Noah's Ark. Many scientists have argued it is a naturally occurring geological feature. But the site has never stopped drawing investigators.

Radar scans reveal corridors and a central chamber

The Noah's Ark Scans team began exploring the Durupınar Formation in 2019, deploying modern technology to probe what lies beneath the surface. By 2024, the team had identified angular structures as deep as 20 feet underground. Andrew Jones, an independent researcher with the group, used ground-penetrating radar to uncover a network of what he called "corridors" converging on a hollow central chamber he dubbed "the atrium."

Jones described the findings in an interview with GB News, as the Daily Mail detailed:

"What's interesting is that these voids are lining up below the ground, and they're not just random. These tunnels also follow a pattern. GPR is just a way to look below the soil using radar."

The team also employed infrared thermography, heat-sensing technology, to supplement the radar data. Jones tied the findings directly to the biblical account of the Ark, which describes three internal levels built to shelter Noah, his family, and pairs of animals.

Jones told GB News: "God told Noah to bring the animals in. And so these animals would have stayed there, plus Noah and his family."

Those are bold claims. Whether the subsurface features represent ancient construction or natural geology remains an open question. The infrared and radar studies have not been confirmed as peer-reviewed. But the pattern of corridors and chambers, aligned with the shape of the surface formation, is what keeps the investigation going.

Earlier reporting on the site's underground scan results documented the same research team's growing body of radar evidence.

Marine deposits and flood evidence

The radar findings are not the only data point. Researchers from multiple universities have studied rock and soil samples from the Durupınar Formation and found marine deposits and seafood remnants dating to between 3,500 and 5,000 years ago. That timeline aligns with the period many scholars associate with a catastrophic flood event described in religious texts across multiple traditions.

The Mount Ararat and Noah's Ark Research Team stated, as Fox News reported: "Our studies show that this region harbored life in that period and that, at some point, it was covered by water, which reinforces the possibility that a catastrophic event of great magnitude occurred."

Researchers added that "the recent evidence suggests that the story might have a basis in reality." The New York Post also covered the marine deposit findings, noting the formation's dimensions match the biblical description.

None of this constitutes proof. But the convergence of ancient cartography, scriptural measurements, geological shape, subsurface structures, and now marine sediment evidence makes the Durupınar Formation unlike any other site in the long search for the Ark.

A Renaissance map with a hidden detail

Urbano Monte created his Planisphere during the Age of Exploration, when European cartographers were redrawing the known world. A Japanese delegation's visit to Milan in 1585 reportedly inspired Monte to begin the project. The finished map, completed two years later, is the largest known early world map. Its original manuscript now resides at Stanford University's David Rumsey Map Center, which digitally restored the document and made it available online.

The map's depiction of Noah's Ark on the mountains of Ararat may have gone unnoticed for nearly 440 years. That Monte placed the Ark in the same region where the Durupınar Formation would later emerge, a formation unknown to the modern world until 1948, is the detail that has researchers and history enthusiasts asking questions.

Biblical archaeology has experienced a broader resurgence in recent years. Separate teams of archaeologists have claimed to identify the lost town of Bethsaida, tied to the miracles of Jesus, illustrating a growing willingness among scholars to take ancient scriptural accounts seriously as guides to real places.

Open questions remain

Skeptics have a fair point: no excavation has produced timber, tools, or artifacts that would settle the matter. The "American researchers" referenced in connection with the site remain unnamed in most accounts. And the specific conclusions of 1970s-era investigators who first studied the formation are not well documented in public reporting.

The Noah's Ark Scans team firmly believes the formation points to something extraordinary. Many geologists remain unconvinced. The gap between belief and proof is real, and honest inquiry demands acknowledging it.

But the evidence keeps accumulating rather than fading. A 1587 map marks the spot. A boat-shaped ridge matches the biblical measurements. Radar shows organized chambers underground. Marine fossils place the site beneath ancient floodwaters. Each piece, alone, proves nothing. Together, they form a case that serious people find worth pursuing.

In an age that dismisses ancient accounts as myth, it is worth noting how often the ground itself has a different story to tell.


About Jenny Curran

Breaking News:

Check This Out:

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Heritage Review is a conservative email-newspaper that publishes every morning. Enter your best email to see our next edition:
Sponsored