Teenager killed in Central Park carriage accident as driver left horse unattended for photo

 June 19, 2026

An 18-year-old tourist from India died after a horse-drawn carriage overturned in Central Park when the driver stepped away to take a photograph, leaving the animal unattended. The horse bolted, clipped a second carriage, and toppled, throwing passengers onto the pavement in what is believed to be the first human fatality in the attraction's more than 150-year history.

The victim, identified as Romanch Mahajan, jumped from the runaway carriage while trying to save his mother, who had also fallen. He struck his head on the ground and was transported to a hospital in critical condition. He was later pronounced dead. Three other passengers did not require treatment.

The death has reignited a fierce debate over whether New York City should ban horse-drawn carriages entirely, and whether the political class that has tolerated known safety failures for years bears responsibility for what happened.

A preventable chain of failures

The basic facts are not in dispute. The carriage driver left his seat to photograph the Mahajan family. While he was off the carriage, the horse, a six-week veteran of Central Park named Sampson, as Breitbart reported, spooked and ran. The carriage struck another carriage and flipped onto its side.

Alexander Kemp, administrative vice president of Transport Workers Union Local 100, which represents carriage drivers, confirmed to local media that the driver violated standard protocol. "It appears the driver was at least at arm's length from his horse," Kemp said, as BBC News reported.

"This is unacceptable. A driver is not supposed to leave the carriage to take photos, ever. We support a full investigation."

That word, "ever", tells you everything about how routine this violation apparently was. A rule exists. The union's own leadership says it was broken. And an 18-year-old is dead.

The medical examiner ruled Mahajan's death the result of blunt force trauma and classified it as accidental. His father, Deepak Mahajan, told the New York Times what the family's final moments looked like. "He was screaming, Mom!" the father recounted to the paper. "My son, just to save his mother, he fell off."

Romanch Mahajan did not die because he panicked. He died because he tried to protect someone he loved, and because the person whose job it was to control that horse was not in his seat.

Eight incidents in thirteen months

This was not a freak occurrence. Fox News reported that the crash was the eighth horse-related incident in and around Central Park in just the past 13 months. That includes a carriage horse named Deniz that collapsed and died near the same location roughly one week earlier. Initial autopsy results attributed Deniz's death to ingesting a toxic plant.

The Central Park Conservancy, which manages the park, had already called for a ban on horse carriages after those earlier incidents. A Conservancy spokesperson said the Mahajan death was "the tragedy we feared when we first called last year for horse carriages to be banned from Central Park due to the risks they pose to public safety and public health."

Eight incidents in 13 months. A dead horse one week. A dead teenager the next. And until now, the city's response has been talk.

The death of the horse Deniz had already reignited the fight over this century-old industry. But it took a human fatality to produce anything resembling urgency from city leaders.

Politicians rush to the microphone

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said he supports removing horse-drawn carriages from Central Park. Following Mahajan's death, Mamdani called on the city to "deliver a just transition that protects workers while ending horse-drawn carriages in Central Park once and for all," the Washington Times reported.

Council member Shahana Hanif posted on X that the incidents "are heartbreaking reminders that horse-drawn carriages are unsafe for both horses and people."

"These incidents are not isolated. We must pass Ryder's Law, end this outdated industry, and ensure a just transition for workers. New York can and must do better."

Council member Harvey Epstein said he was "horrified" by the "tragic accident" and posted a statement of his own.

"Time and again, we are seeing both horses and people suffer the consequences of an industry that poses serious risks to public safety and animal welfare. New York City can't continue to ignore these tragedies."

The statements are polished. The sentiment is familiar. But the question these officials should be asked is simple: Where were you after incidents one through seven?

Ryder's Law and the long delay

The proposed legislation at the center of this debate is called Ryder's Law. Under its terms, New York City would stop issuing new carriage licenses and phase out the rides entirely over two years. The bill's current legislative status, whether it has been voted on, advanced through committee, or simply introduced, is not clear from available public statements.

What is clear is that it has not passed. And the reasons it has not passed are political, not substantive. The carriage industry employs unionized workers. Those workers have political allies. And for years, the calculus in City Hall has favored inaction.

The union itself moved faster than the politicians after Mahajan's death. TWU Local 100 suspended all carriage operations and shuttered its stables. Kemp said the union was conducting "extensive internal discussions of safety protocols and how they can be improved." The driver involved was suspended, and the horse Sampson was retired.

That is more concrete action than any elected official has taken. And it came from the industry's own labor union, not from the regulatory apparatus that is supposed to protect the public.

A tourist's dream, a family's nightmare

Romanch Mahajan came to New York as a tourist. His father told reporters, "This incident should be taken very seriously. It took my son's dream away."

The family came to see the city. They got into a carriage in Central Park, one of the most iconic tourist experiences in America. And because a driver left his seat to snap a photo, that family will fly home without their son.

No charges or citations against the driver have been reported. No named agency has been identified as leading a formal investigation. The city has not announced any immediate regulatory changes beyond the union's voluntary pause. The name of the carriage company or operator involved has not been made public.

These are not minor gaps. They are the kinds of details that tell you whether a city is serious about accountability, or whether it plans to let the news cycle do the work and move on. The loss of any life deserves more than a moment's attention from the institutions responsible for public safety.

The real question

The debate over horse-drawn carriages in New York has gone on for years. Animal welfare advocates want them gone. The industry argues for better regulation. Politicians express concern and then do nothing.

But this is no longer just an animal welfare question. An 18-year-old is dead. The driver violated a rule that his own union says should never be broken. The horse had been working in the park for only six weeks. And the city had already logged seven prior incidents in barely a year.

At some point, a pattern of known risk plus political inaction stops being a policy disagreement and starts being negligence. New York City's leaders had the information. They had the warnings. They had a dead horse one week before a dead teenager.

They chose to wait. Romanch Mahajan paid the price.


About Jenny Curran

Breaking News:

Check This Out:

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Heritage Review is a conservative email-newspaper that publishes every morning. Enter your best email to see our next edition:
Sponsored