New York socialist candidate draws Logan Act scrutiny after pledging to carry Mexico's 'fight' into Congress

 September 18, 2026

Claire Valdez, a democratic socialist running for a New York City congressional seat, faces calls for a federal probe after she disclosed meetings with Mexico's ruling left-wing party and vowed to bring their "fight" to Washington.

Valdez, the Democratic nominee for New York's 7th Congressional District, posted on X that she had met with "comrades" in Mexico's Morena party, the ruling political movement in that country, and pledged to carry the spirit of Mexico's independence struggle into the U.S. Congress. The post prompted an immigration attorney to publicly call on the State Department to investigate whether Valdez's conduct warrants scrutiny under the Logan Act, a rarely enforced 1799 federal law that criminalizes unauthorized efforts by private citizens to influence foreign governments in disputes involving the United States.

No investigation has been confirmed. But the episode lays bare a pattern: far-left candidates openly aligning themselves with foreign political movements while running for seats in the very government they describe as an "empire."

Valdez called the U.S. an empire and Morena members her 'comrades'

In her post on X, Fox News Digital reported, Valdez wrote:

"215 years ago, Mexicans fought an empire that demanded our land and our labor. And we won. I'll carry that fight with me to Congress as New York's first Mexican-American representative."

She continued by saying she was "strengthened not just by" Mexico's history "but its present," and described meeting members of Morena who are "standing up to the empires and corporations that have always taken from us, and building a government for the working class." She closed with "Viva la Independencia, Viva México!"

Valdez is seeking the seat being vacated by retiring Rep. Nydia Velázquez in a district that covers Bushwick and Ridgewood in New York City. She will face Republican community organizer Melvin Rivera and other candidates in the general election.

Her candidacy fits a broader trend of socialist-backed candidates gaining ground within the Democratic Party, a development that has alarmed even some longtime party strategists.

Immigration attorney asks State Department to review Valdez under the Logan Act

Alicia Nieves, an immigration attorney and columnist, responded to Valdez's post by tweeting directly at Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, a former U.S. ambassador to Mexico. Nieves wrote:

"Given that she is currently a congressional nominee, not a member of [Congress], and appears to have discussed facilitating support contrary to current U.S. policy as well as describing our country an 'empire' that has 'stolen from us'... I hope the administration will review whether these communications warrant investigation under the Logan Act."

Nieves drew a sharp distinction: Valdez is a nominee, not a sitting member of Congress. She holds no diplomatic authority and no official portfolio on foreign affairs. Yet she disclosed meetings with officials of a foreign ruling party while running for federal office, and framed those meetings in openly adversarial terms toward the United States.

Christina Pushaw, a top communications official for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, offered a blunter assessment. "This would be a great campaign for Congress in Mexico," Pushaw said.

The growing willingness of far-left Democrats to adopt rhetoric that frames the United States as a hostile force has prompted figures like veteran strategist James Carville to demand a formal split between the Democratic Party and its socialist wing.

A 226-year-old law with almost no enforcement history

The Logan Act dates to 1799, when the John Adams administration and congressional Federalists objected to Pennsylvania politician George Logan's unauthorized trip to France. Logan had traveled to Paris on his own to ease tensions during what historians call the "Quasi-War", an undeclared naval conflict between the United States and revolutionary France. Congress responded by passing the law bearing his name.

In over two centuries, only two people have faced formal proceedings under the statute. In 1803, a Kentucky farmer named Francis Flournoy was indicted by a grand jury after advocating for a separate Western United States allied with France. He was never convicted. In 1853, a man named Jonas P. Levy was arrested and held to bail after writing to Mexico's president. He was never convicted either.

No one has ever been successfully prosecuted under the Logan Act. That has not stopped politicians from invoking it against their opponents. Democrats cited the law against Donald Trump in 2016 after he publicly said, "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." The Logan Act has also been raised against former Sen. John Kerry and Rev. Jesse Jackson, among others.

The law's near-total lack of enforcement history makes a prosecution unlikely. But the underlying question, whether a congressional nominee should be meeting with foreign political parties and pledging solidarity against her own country's policies, does not require a courtroom to answer.

Valdez already has a record of confrontational activism

Valdez, a New York Assembly member, was arrested on August 1, 2025, alongside New York City Council member Tiffany Caban after the two refused to leave the lobby of Sen. Chuck Schumer's Manhattan office. The charges and circumstances surrounding that arrest were not detailed further.

Her family background adds another layer. Her father, Larry Valdez, has been linked to a company that helped construct a Texas immigration center during the Obama administration, a detail that sits uneasily alongside Claire Valdez's rhetoric casting the United States as an exploitative empire.

The Democratic Socialists of America have targeted races across the country in recent cycles, pushing candidates who openly advocate abolishing ICE and implementing Medicare-for-all. Valdez fits that mold. Her district race is part of a broader pattern of far-left candidates seeking to reshape the Democratic Party from within.

Fox News Digital reached out to Valdez, the Mexican government, Morena, and Rivera for comment. No responses were reported.

When 'fighting empires' means fighting your own country

Valdez's post was not a vague gesture of cultural pride. She identified the United States as an empire. She described Morena members as "comrades." She said those comrades were "standing up to the empires and corporations that have always taken from us." And she pledged to bring that posture into Congress.

A candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives traveled to meet with officials of a foreign ruling party, adopted their framing of the United States as an oppressor, and promised to carry their cause into the halls of American government. Whether or not the Logan Act applies, voters in New York's 7th District deserve to know exactly what "fight" Valdez intends to bring, and on whose behalf.

The episode is the latest example of far-left insurgents rattling the Democratic Party by running candidates whose loyalties seem to point everywhere but toward the country they want to govern.

Americans elect representatives to serve their interests, not to import the grievances of foreign political parties and dress them up as liberation.


About Owen Bates

Breaking News:

Check This Out:

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Heritage Review is a conservative email-newspaper that publishes every morning. Enter your best email to see our next edition:
Sponsored