Democrats block DHS funding as U.S. strikes Iran and homeland security employees go unpaid

 March 1, 2026

The partial government shutdown left Department of Homeland Security employees without paychecks at the worst possible moment: the same weekend the United States and Israel commenced airstrikes against Iranian positions, including the palace of Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, who was later declared dead by Jerusalem officials.

Fox News reported that as Friday rolled into Saturday, Transportation Security Administration officers began effectively working pro bono. The men and women charged with screening every passenger at every airport in the country showed up to their posts with no guarantee of when they'd be paid.

Meanwhile, Iran pledged to strike back, and the nation lurched closer to a footing not seen since the early days of the War on Terror.

The TSA put it bluntly:

"Right now, the men and women of TSA are showing up to work without a paycheck due to the reckless DHS shutdown despite the fact that Democrat members of Congress are still getting paid."

That contrast requires no editorial embellishment.

Republicans sound the alarm

Rep. Daniel Meuser, the Blue Mountain congressman from Pennsylvania, framed the situation in terms that leave little room for ambiguity. He called Democrats' continued obstruction of DHS funding "irresponsible and dangerous."

"Given developments in the Middle East and the ongoing threat posed by Iran and its terrorist proxies, Democrats in the House and Senate must cease the politics and must immediately fund the Department of Homeland Security."

Meuser wasn't alone. Sen. David McCormick echoed the urgency with a pointed message aimed directly at his colleagues across the aisle:

"Now would be a good time for Democrats to drop their opposition to DHS funding and pass the bill to support our homeland security."

McCormick added that continuing to play political games with national security given the unfolding situation in the Middle East is "dangerous." That word kept surfacing on Saturday. Dangerous. Not a talking point. A description.

DHS leadership responds

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem moved to reassure the public that the department's mission had not lapsed, even if the paychecks had.

"I am in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any potential threats to the homeland."

The posture is clear: the operational work continues regardless of the funding impasse. But "regardless" is doing a lot of heavy lifting when the people executing that mission are working for free. The shutdown doesn't eliminate the threat environment. It just punishes the people navigating it.

Democrats choose a curious moment to talk about ICE

Just prior to the strikes, Sen. Charles Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries released a joint statement that read less like a response to a national security crisis and more like a press release from a midterm campaign:

"We have received the White House's counteroffer and are reviewing it closely. Democrats remain committed to keep fighting for real reforms to rein in ICE and stop the violence."

Read that again. The country is staring down a military confrontation with Iran, DHS employees are unpaid, and Democratic leadership's stated priority is reining in Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Not funding the department responsible for protecting the homeland. Not ensuring TSA officers get compensated. Not addressing the prospect of retaliatory attacks inside U.S. borders. ICE reform.

This tells you everything about what the shutdown is actually about. Democrats aren't blocking DHS funding over fiscal responsibility or government efficiency. They're holding the department hostage to weaken immigration enforcement. The leverage is the paycheck of every DHS employee in the country.

Thompson's criticism lands flat

Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the top Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, told NOTUS News that the strikes lacked "a clear strategy" and that the country is "vulnerable to ensuing terrorism attacks today because of Trump's reckless, inflammatory actions."

"I am deeply concerned about the administration's attention to possible threats and its ability to protect Americans."

The irony is staggering. Thompson's party is the reason DHS employees aren't getting paid. His caucus is the reason the department is operating under shutdown conditions during an active military engagement. And yet, his concern is that the administration might not be paying enough attention to threats.

If you are genuinely worried about the nation's ability to protect Americans, the first thing you do is fund the agency tasked with protecting Americans. You don't hold its budget hostage over ICE grievances and then complain the department seems distracted. That's not concern. That's sabotage dressed up as oversight.

Fetterman breaks ranks, sort of

In a now familiar pattern, Sen. John Fetterman distinguished himself from his party's posture. Retweeting an alert that Khamenei had been killed, Fetterman wrote on X:

"Let's see who grieves for that garbage."

It's a blunt line, and it captures something the Democratic leadership's carefully lawyered statements completely miss: the moral clarity of the moment. The United States and its closest ally in the Middle East struck the palace of a dictator who has sponsored terrorism across the globe. The appropriate response is not hand-wringing about strategy memos. It's recognition that some targets are legitimate and some regimes earn what comes to them.

Fetterman's willingness to say so out loud only highlights how allergic the rest of his party is to anything resembling moral directness when American military power is involved.

The real question

The shutdown was a political calculation before Saturday. Now it is something else entirely. With Iran pledging retaliation and the homeland threat environment elevated, every day DHS employees work without pay is a day Democrats own.

Republicans have been clear: pass the funding bill. Meuser said it. McCormick said it. The TSA said it. The path out of this is not complicated. It just requires Democrats to stop conditioning homeland security funding on their immigration enforcement wish list.

There are TSA officers standing in airport terminals right now, scanning bags and checking IDs, who have no idea when their next paycheck arrives. There are intelligence analysts tracking Iranian-linked threats inside U.S. borders who are doing it on the promise of eventual compensation. There are border agents, cyber analysts, and Coast Guard personnel all caught in the same vise.

Congressional Democrats are still getting paid. Every single one of them.

That's not a talking point. That's the story.


About Maria Reese Paul

Maria is a staff writer covering conservative politics, policy, and culture with a focus on Washington’s most pressing debates for Heritage Review. She is Passionate about amplifying voices often overlooked in mainstream media.

Breaking News:

Check This Out:

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Heritage Review is a conservative email-newspaper that publishes every morning. Enter your best email to see our next edition:
Sponsored