U.S. counterterrorism agencies on high alert for sleeper cells after killing of Iran's Supreme Leader

 March 1, 2026

The killing of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign has triggered an immediate domestic security mobilization, with FBI Director Kash Patel ordering counterterrorism teams to high alert and federal agencies scrambling to monitor suspected Iranian-linked operatives already inside the United States.

Fox News reported that Operation Epic Fury, the coordinated strike that killed Khamenei and several senior Iranian officials Saturday morning, achieved a strategic objective that would have been unthinkable under previous administrations. But the conversation has already shifted to what comes next on American soil.

The threat isn't hypothetical. It's been building for decades.

The Domestic Threat Picture

Chris Swecker, a former assistant FBI director, laid it out plainly in an interview with Fox News:

"If ever there's going to be a Hezbollah cell or a Hamas cell act in the United States in a violent way, it's now."

Swecker's warning carries weight. He pointed out that both Hezbollah and Hamas are Iranian-backed organizations, and both have maintained a presence on U.S. soil since the 1980s. That's not speculation. That's four decades of known activity.

"We know that they have cells here. We also know that there are lone sympathizers, many of whom have come out in these protest groups."

The protest movements that swept through American cities and college campuses in recent years didn't emerge from nowhere. Swecker's assessment connects those visible demonstrations to a deeper, more dangerous infrastructure of organized cells and radicalized individuals who may now feel compelled to act.

Four Years of Open Doors

Swecker drove the point further, tying the current vulnerability directly to border policy failures that conservatives have warned about for years. His assessment was blunt:

"We just come off four years of open borders, and I have said before that that was an open door for terrorists to terrorist cells and terror sympathizers to infiltrate. Many were already here, but it's impossible that they would not infiltrate into these particular groups and sort of act as catalysts, as enablers."

This is the part that should unsettle every American. The cells that existed since the 1980s were bad enough. But a border that functioned as a suggestion rather than a barrier for four years gave hostile actors exactly what they needed: fresh bodies, new networks, and the anonymity that comes with a system deliberately designed not to track who enters the country.

Every Republican who sounded the alarm about national security implications at the southern border was told they were fearmongering.

Every warning about the intersection of mass illegal immigration and terrorism was dismissed as xenophobia dressed up in policy language. Now the FBI director is mobilizing counterterrorism assets on American streets, and suddenly those warnings look less like politics and more like prophecy.

The Federal Response

To their credit, federal agencies moved quickly. Patel issued his orders Friday night, before the strikes even landed Saturday morning. He posted on X:

"Last night, I instructed our Counterterrorism and intelligence teams to be on high alert and mobilize all assisting security assets needed."

Patel indicated the FBI remains at the forefront of deterring attacks at home and will continue working around the clock to protect Americans. Federal and local law enforcement have boosted on-the-ground security in major U.S. cities as a precautionary measure.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed she is in direct coordination with federal intelligence and law enforcement partners to monitor and thwart potential threats to the homeland. The posture is serious. The coordination appears tight.

No specific, credible threats have been publicly identified. That's worth noting, but it's also worth understanding what it means. The absence of a specific threat doesn't mean the absence of danger. It means the threat is diffuse, unpredictable, and potentially embedded in communities that have had years to prepare.

A Threat That Doesn't Stay Static

Jason Pack, a retired FBI supervisory special agent, offered the kind of sober analysis that cuts through both complacency and panic. He noted that intelligence and counterterrorism communities work on scenarios like this continuously, long before any conflict begins. The preparation isn't reactive. It's baked in.

But he also issued a critical caution:

"When the United States commits to a joint military campaign with Israel, the domestic threat environment doesn't simply remain static. It could shift, potentially significantly."

Pack pointed to adversarial actors including Hezbollah, Hamas's external networks, and Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps proxies, all of which have historically demonstrated intent and, in some cases, the capability to retaliate through indirect or unconventional means.

The killing of their supreme patron changes the calculus. Proxies that once operated under a chain of command may now act out of desperation, vengeance, or sheer organizational chaos.

Decapitated regimes don't always collapse quietly. Sometimes the limbs thrash.

The Real Question

Operation Epic Fury represents the kind of decisive action that reshapes geopolitics. The elimination of Khamenei and senior Iranian officials is a seismic event, one that will reverberate through the Middle East for years. That part of the story will be written by diplomats and historians.

The part that matters right now, this week, is what happens in American cities. The infrastructure is here. The sympathizers are here. The question isn't whether hostile actors exist on U.S. soil. Former FBI leadership confirms they do.

The question is whether the years of neglect at the border and the years of tolerance toward radical networks on American streets left gaps too wide for even a fully mobilized FBI to close.

Parts of the Department of Homeland Security reportedly face a partial shutdown, adding another variable to an already complex security picture at the worst possible moment.

The men and women in federal law enforcement are doing their jobs. The leadership is coordinating. The alerts are out. But the uncomfortable truth remains: the best time to secure the homeland against this exact scenario was years ago. The second best time is now, and everyone in a position of authority knows it.

The strike landed overseas. The consequences live here.


About Maria Reese Paul

Maria is a staff writer covering conservative politics, policy, and culture with a focus on Washington’s most pressing debates for Heritage Review. She is Passionate about amplifying voices often overlooked in mainstream media.

Breaking News:

Check This Out:

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Read Next Issue:

Top 5 News Stories

Heritage Review is a conservative email-newspaper that publishes every morning. Enter your best email to see our next edition: